The fresh themes understood within our research tend to serve as new riding affairs for the remainder of this papers

, 2015; Cardoso and you can Souza, 2016; Santiago and you may Saliba, 2016; 2 Santos and you may Jalalzai, 2021). Contained in this really works we’re going to focus on misogyny because the acquiesced by all of our interviewees relating to Rousseff’s six years for the fuel, especially centering on the partnership anywhere between misogynistic backlash while the gendered twice join character recognized. From the following area we offer a very nuanced meaning to have all the subcategories recognized (come across Dining table dos), delivering remain-by yourself meanings and examples on investigation alongside descriptive analyses out of secret minutes inside Rousseff’s presidency you to exemplify the new vibrant between our nuanced proposal having taking a look at this new gendered twice bind, misogynist backlash, as well as internet consequence into Rousseff’s presidency.

The fresh new four subcategories identified starred in the details on varying account (come across Tables 3, 4). Several layouts starred in large ratio: Testing so you’re able to Men and you may Misogynyments themed as the research so you’re able to guys featured inside the nearly 1 / 2 of the interviews and you may illustrated thirty six per cent out-of the statements codifiedments themed once the misogyny were almost all comments (38 percent) and you may appeared in forty two per cent of all interviews. This means that, interviewees was most aware of Rousseff’s character due to the fact chairman compared for other men people in politics and you can previous presidents, and the means Rousseff is penalized during their unique government on account of gendered expectation and you will backlash.

While looking which have quicker frequency in the interview, another a couple of themes bring important framework to wisdom it is possible to sexist backlash inside the presidency off Brazil’s basic woman president. Discussions about Rousseff made an effort to adhere to gendered standards ascribed so you’re able to feminine (Conforming toward Double Bind) starred in more than 10 percent of one’s feedback coded and you can interview held. At the same time, discussion about precisely how Rousseff challenged the newest gendered hopes of her updates (Problematic the fresh new Double Bind) appeared in more than you to 5th of all of the interview, constituting sixteen percent of all the statements coded.

The newest description of mathematical density of your thematic data brings a starting point so you can a good qualitative analysis of each motif, emphasizing the connection between for every motif, especially the connection involving the about three themes yourself related to the fresh gendered twice join (assessment, conforming, and problematic) therefore the misogynistic backlash you to definitely used.

Testing so you can guys

One of many subcategories understood are contrasting away from Dilma Rousseff so you can dudes, both evaluating Rousseff to male people in politics and you may describing how things could well be different when the Rousseff were a man. For this reason, we learned that there is both an abstract role and simple aspect of their unique testing so you can men. Within the a conceptual experience, we frequently noticed the term, “if the she was indeed men” to spell it out just how a posture might have starred aside in different ways got Dilma not started a woman. The story depicted inside our interview was away from a network that “likes guys” (Respondent 88, ), which have “no unlock gender discrimination, although proven fact that [a good politician] was a man is a plus” (Respondent 8, ). Whenever sharing which testing more concretely, there was a focus on Rousseff’s scratchy character, new “tough lady up to sensitive guys.” The fresh offer lower than brings a whole lot more perspective:

Talks throughout the Rousseff’s impeachment therefore the sexism and you can misogyny behind brand new process was discussed from inside the popular news (Hao, 2016; Hertzman, 2016; Romero and you can Kaiser, 2016) and in scholarly performs (Zdebskyi mais aussi al

Yes, and so they said that she are a painful person, you to she could not correspond with people, that she got an authoritarian way of talking. Exactly what for men appears as a match “no, he is an arduous people, a personal-convinced individual that knows just what the guy wants.” So you’re able to their own try presented while the negative “no, she cannot learn how to cam, this woman is hard, she actually is which” within the a poor means. The way they communicate with all of us, female. You will find reached a certain reputation, the audience is becoming harsh, we’re deviating from to help you how to become a lady, who’s sweet, transparent, silent and you can for example. The type of Dilma being is the kind of women that have the ability to feel solid in this a completely patriarchal globe, up against so it buy you to is available (Respondent 79, ).