The outcome displayed levels of PCM notably determined by the sort out-of relationship (H(2) = ; p =
Moral Factors
All of the moral affairs were secured, according to the assistance regarding Resolution Zero. of one’s Ministry off Fitness. Its run is actually approved by the Integrity and you will Lookup Chamber off the fresh Centro de- Filosofia elizabeth Ciencias Humanas of your Universidade Government do Rio de- Janeiro (UFRJ) (CAAE No. 03490118.8. and Process Zero. step three.). Towards the front page of the on line questionnaire, there can be the latest 100 % free and you can Told Concur Name (FICT), which shown facts about the risks and you will benefits associated with answering the research, in addition to verify out-of withdrawal from concur, in place of prejudice and also at when. Only those members who featured brand new agree alternative got usage of the analysis content. Individuals who didn’t see the consent choice were redirected to the conclusion the brand new survey.
To analyze you’ll be able to differences in PCM and you will NCM, with regards to the sociodemographic variables: sex, community, proper care of younger siblings, presence otherwise lack of a partner, and having or otherwise not having people, contrasting anywhere between organizations were made making use of the Mann-Whitney U decide to try ( Desk step one).
In the first, the connection between PCM and you may NCM try examined and it also are unearthed that PCM (Yards = ; DP = ) correlates adversely on NCM (Yards = ; DP = ); p =
Statistically significant differences with small effect sizes were found in PCM in three categories tested: occupation (U = 37; p = .035; PS est = .47), presence/absence of partner (U = 10; p = .000; PS est = .29) and presence/absence of children (U = 21; p = .002; PS est = .44). It was observed that the participants who were unemployed (Mdn = ), who had https://lovingwomen.org/sv/italienska-kvinnor/ one or more children (Mdn = ) and who were in a relationship (Mdn = ); had significantly higher levels of PCM than people who worked (Mdn = ), who had no children (Mdn = ) and who did not have a relationship (Mdn = ).
On the other hand, NCM indicated statistically significant differences with small effect sizes related to sex (U = 19; p = .000; PS est = .43) and the presence/absence of children (U = 10; p = .000; PS est = .34). It was observed that both women (Mdn = ) as for the participants who do not have children (Mdn = ) have significantly higher levels of NCM than men (Mdn = ) and participants with children (Mdn = ).
Based on the results obtained in the comparison between people who are or are not in a stable relationship, we tested the possible differences in PCM according to the type of relationship using the Kruskal Wallis test. 000). Mann-Whitney tests were used to follow up on this finding. A Bonferroni correction was applied and all effects were tested at the .02 level. PCM levels showed no differences between people who were dating and people who were married or in a stable union (U = 29; p = .039; PS est = .47). However, statistically significant differences were found in PCM levels between married and in a stable union (U = 5; p = .000; PS est = .41), of which married people (Mdn = ) had higher levels of PCM when compared to people who were in a stable union (Mdn = ).
A few Spearman correlations have been conducted. 000; roentgen = -.494; roentgen dos = .24. About second analysis new dating ranging from PCM, NCM and you can 16 personal and contextual variables was in fact tested and certainly will get noticed from inside the Desk 2. Weak connections was indeed located one another positive and negative ranging from PCM or NCM and several of the parameters checked out. Specifically the fresh new sociodemographic variables: “number of sisters” and “delivery acquisition” together with personality circumstances: “conscientiousness” and you may “visibility to experience” showed no extreme correlations having PCM and you may NCM.